PlEA AgReemeNts At "ANy" stagE duRinNg the CRimiNs pRocess CAUSE the defendant Harm; considering that they All contrined a factually iNsufficint deadly weapow finding on their fACE?

(3 Ae challeges to the validity of A caitical Element of AN indictment "ouly"to be Raised by defendant's counsel if the defendant were to proceed to tRiAl?

(4) Did counsels filuRe to Aduise Applicant of the basic elemeNts of proof the State wAs RequiRed to pRove to sustAin thE inclusioN of AN AffiemBtivE dendly weapON f finding cruse the defendant prejudice and hanm Resuting in defendant's guilty pleri's being involuntarily induced?

Dc ve ndsent or en o detendants behalf Rewder her AssistaNce iNeffective at all stoges of the chimivel proces especialy dueing the ple peoceding?

(6) DId tRir Cousel's iNAdequatE peefmANcE duRiNg the PlEA pRoceediNgs CAUSe Applicant hnam or prejudice?

(7) WAs couses Repesentation deficient At Ple PRoceing? UNPROFESSIONAL ERROR'S?

ple gy A olt Et

C1o) WAs defendant denied Due PRocess ANd Effective AssistANce of counsel wheN Counsel mislerd defendant by sthating that defendant could Not challenge the Validity of the Stat's deadly weapow finding unless defendant went to trinl?

Was Agpli canl's guilty pleac) involuwtaay duce 40 counsels wet echve deficient Assistance jw Tetality duaing all Stages of the caiminel process ?