Does a district court have a duty under FRCP 26(g)(3) to sanction public entities and their attorneys for improper withholding of documents requested through discovery before settlement?

On the facts before it, did the district court abuse its discretion regarding the public entity's and its attorneys' withholding of documents?

Did the Court of Appeals abuse the abuse of discretion standard of review by not examining the whole record?

Should the Barton Doctrine be applied to a state court receiver sued in his personal capacity for damages under § 1983?

Is a constitutional violation within the scope of a state court receiver's authority?

Did Petitioner's plead a constitutional violation by the state court receiver?

Does a district court have a duty under FRCP 26(g)(3) to sanction public entities and their attorneys for improper withholding of documents requested through discovery before settlement?