No. 18-6538

Steven Bernard Sydnor v. Kevin Hampton, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation due-process fair-trial jackson-v-virginia miranda-rights miranda-warning sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04
Question Presented (from Petition)

Claim 1.
Whether defendant's Constitution 5th and 14th Amendment rights
were violated by the trial court denial of defendant's Motion
to Suppress statements he made to the police that were the product .
of custodial interrogation without the benefit of a Miranda .
warning?

Claim 2.
Whether defendant's Gonstitution 5th and 14th Amendment rights
were violated. by the trial court's errors. of admitting graphic
photographs of the victim's face and body at trial, which
ai denied. defendant a fair trial?

Claim 3.

Whether defendant's Constitution right to due process were © - |
violated,because petitioner's ¢orviction was obtained as_the. .. result of evidence that is insufficient to persuade a p#operly ~- :
instructed, reasonable,*jury of his guilt beyond. a reasonable '
doubt. See Jackson v. Virginia, 433 U.S. 307 (1979).

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether defendant's Constitution 5th and 14th Amendment rights were violated

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-10-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 3, 2018)

Attorneys

Steven Bernard Sydnor
Steven Bernard Sydnor — Petitioner