POINT I
PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER 28 USC 2241(a)(c)(3) SUBMITTED AGAINST THE PERSON(S) WHO HOLDS PETITIONER IN WHAT PETITIONER CLAIMS THAT HE IS UNLAWFULLY DETAINED OR IN CUSTODY RESTRAINED OF HIS PERSONAL LIBERTY IN VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION OR LAWS OR TREATIES OF THE UNITED STATES, BY PURSUING THE VALIDITY OF THE JURISDICTION OF HIS DETENTION TO OBTAIN HIS LIBERTY PURSUANT TO UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION Art. III Sec.2 cl.(2) and UNITED STATES CONST.Art.1, Sec.9 cl.(2) IS THE PROPER APPLICATION?

POINT II
MAY A FEDERAL COURT ENTERTAIN AND DETERMINE THE MERIT OF A STATE PRISONER'S APPLICATION FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF FROM A VOID JUDGMENT, ILLEGALLY IN CUSTODY RESTRAINED OF HIS PERSONAL LIBERTY IN CONTRAVENTION OF THE CONSTITUTION OR LAWS, OR TREATIES OF THE UNITED STATES, EVEN THOUGH PRISONER EXHAUSTED A FORMERLY AVAILABLE STATE REMEDY AND THERE IS NOW NO STATE REMEDY AVAILABLE?

Whether a federal court may entertain and determine the merits of a state prisoner's application for habeas corpus relief from a void judgment, when the prisoner is illegally restrained of his personal liberty in contravention of the Constitution or laws, or treaties of the United States, even though the prisoner exhausted a formerly available state remedy and there is now no state remedy available