DOES THE 11TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS THREE JUDGE PANEL HAVE THE RIGHT TO CREATE CONFLICTS AMONGST THE CIRCUITS WHEN IT UNILATERALLY CHANGED THE SUPREME COURT TEXT AND MEANING IN FRY V. NAPOLEON COMMUNITY & 21

DOES CHANGING THE TEXT, VERNACULAR AND MEANING OF A SUPREME COURT OPINION ABRIDGE THE COURTS ORIGINAL MEANING TO THE POINT OF CREATING A FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION? PG .S 2,4 & 23

IS THE 11TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS PANEL PERMITTED TO VIOLATE DUE PROCESS OF LAW PRINCIPLES BY UNILATERALLY CREATING "SEPARATE JUDICIAL SYSTEM RULINGS" FOR AFRICAN AMERICAN LITIGANTS EXCLUDED FROM SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 2,4 & 24

IS REVIEW WARRANTED BECAUSE 34 C.F.R. 300.154(d)(2)(v) MANDATES THAT PUBLIC AGENCIES LIKE SCHOOL DISTRICTS OBTAIN PARENTAL CONSENT BEFORE ACCESSING FEDERALLY RESOURCES OR PERFORMING THE I.E.P. PROCESS ASA MATTEROF FEDERAL LAW. . PG.S 2,3 & 5

Does the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals three judge panel have the right to create conflicts amongst the circuits when it unilaterally changed the Supreme Court text and meaning in Fry v. Napoleon Community School?