(1ST QUESTION ) MR TEDESCO'S COMPLAINT WAS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AN IN IT'S ENTIRETY.

(2ND QUESTION) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND WAS DISMISSED.

(3RD QUESTION) ARE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS BARRED BY HECK V. HUMPHREY?.

(4TH QUESTION ) DOES PLAINTIFF HAVE TO PROVE HIS CONVICTION , OR SENTENCE HAD TO BE REVERSED, EXPUNGED AND OR INVALIDATED.

(5TH QUESTION ) WERE PLAINTIFF'S DOUBLE JEOPARDY RIGHT'S VIOLATED?.

(6TH QUESTION ) DOES THE ROOKER-FELDMAN-DOCTORINE PROHIBIT REVIEW OF PLAINTIFF'S § 1983 CLAIM.

(7 TH QUESTION ) IS THE YOUNGER -ABSTENTION APPLICABLE TO PLAINTIFF'S § 1983 CLAIM.

(8TH QUESTION ) ARE PROSECUTORS IN THE COMPLAINT ENTITLED TO IMMUNITY.

(9TH QUESTION ) DID PLAINTIFF PURSUE AN APPEAL TO ADDRESS ANY ALLEGED DEFECT'S IN BOTH HIS CONVICTION AND SENTENCE.

(10TH QUESTION ) DID PLAINTIFF IDENTIFY AMENDMENT'S TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION , AND THE STEP'S THAT WERE TAKEN IN ORDER TO VIOLATE THE TEDESCO'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT'S.

Did Mr. Tedesco's complaint get dismissed with prejudice?