Did the Courts below commit structural error by usurping Law to improperly re-characterize a Class Action §1983 Complaint as Habeas Corpus which seriously undermines fundamental fairness, reaching the desired hypothetical judgment, where the State's "Access to the Courts" scheme is inherently unreliable to process a claim of a now declared prohibited punishment?

Should the question left open in Lewis v.Casay, be now fully answered by This Court, with respect to the question above?

Did the Courts below commit structural error by usurping Law to improperly re-characterize a Class Action §1983 Complaint as Habeas Corpus