I
SHOULD THE DENIAL OF MR. RENTAS' COA BE REVERSED AND
RECONSIDERED DUE TO THE RECENT RULING BY THIS COURT IN
MARION WILSON V. ERIC SELLERS, WARDEN 584 U.S. (2018); THE
CASE BY WHICH MR. RENTAS' CLAIM ONE, TWO AND FOUR OF HIS
HABEAS PETITION WERE REVIEWED AND DENIED BY THE FEDERAL
DISTRICT COURT AND COA DENIED BY THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
COURT OF APPEALS?

II
DID THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH
CIRCUIT ERR WHEN IT CONCLUDED THAT THE DISTRICT COURT'S
ASSESSMENT OF GROUND ONE WAS NOT DEBATABLE OR THAT THE
STATE COURT'S DECISION WAS NOT CONTRARY TO OR AN
UNREASONABLE APPLICATION OF THE CLEARLY ESTABLISHED
SUPREME COURT LAW ANNOUNCED IN GIGLIO WHEN RULING ON
PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 28
U.S.C. 2253 (c) (2)?

IH
DID THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH
CIRCUIT ERR WHEN IT CONCLUDED THAT THE DISTRICT COURT'S
ASSESSMENT OF GROUND TWO AND FOUR WERE NOT DEBATABLE
OR THAT THE STATE COURT'S DECISION WAS NOT CONTRARY TO OR
AN UNREASONABLE APPLICATION OF THE CLEARLY ESTABLISHED
SUPREME COURT LAW ANNOUNCED IN STRICKLAND WHEN RULING
ON PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF
APPEALABILITY 28 U.S.C. 2253 (c) (2)

Lv
DID THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH
CIRCUIT DEPART FROM THE ACCEPTED AND USUAL COURSE OF
JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS WHEN IT FAILED TO STATE THE REASONS
WHY A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHOULD NOT ISSUE AS
REQUIRED BY FED.R.APP.P. 22(B)

Should the denial of Mr. Rentas' COA be reversed and reconsidered due to the recent ruling by this Court in Marion Wilson v. Eric Sellers, Warden 584 USS. (2018)