Whether the United States Supreme Court can review the abuse of discretions standard applied? Whether this Court would still review de novo the vast majority of the issues on this Petition for Writ of Certiorari? Under the abuse of discretion standard, the Appellate Court must first "determine de novo whether the trial court identified the correct legal rule to apply to the relief requested."

Whether The Federal District Court of Nevada has supplemental jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367, over the subject matter of the Petitioner's claims because those claims are so related to Petitioner's federal claims as to form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution Amendment Fourteen, Section 1.

Whether, in conflict with decisions of the Fourth and Eighth Circuits, federal statutory silence overrides any right to contribution under state law for liabilities arising under the federal statute regardless of whether Congress intended to preempt the state law; and

Whether, in conflict with decisions of the First and Seventh Circuits, a trustee lacks standing under SIPA or the Bankruptcy Code to assert claims against parties that hastened or deepened the bankruptcy and are therefore general to all of an estate's customers or creditors.

Whether the abuse of discretion standard applies to review of the issues presented in the petition