1. Did the 5th Circuit err in finding that Appellant Juliette Fairley failed to state a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 2000a, or 42 U.S.C § 12182, where there is legal authority that Lakeside may be considered a place of public accommodation, and Fairley has associational standing under the American with Disabilities Act to bring her claim?

2. Did the 5th Circuit err in finding that, it lacked jurisdiction when Appellant Juliette Fairley has stated a loss of consortium claim, thus establishing diversity jurisdiction?

3. Did the 5th Circuit err in failing to consider the factors mandated under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 19 when it dismissed Appellant Juliette Fairley for lack of jurisdiction because James Fairley's guardian Mauricette Fairley was not named in the suit against Lakeside?

Did the 5th Circuit err in finding that Appellant Juliette Fairley failed to state a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 2000a, or 42 U.S.C § 12182, where there is legal authority that Lakeside may be considered a place of public accommodation, and Fairley has associational standing under the American with Disabilities Act to bring her claim?