I. WHETHER THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 36.1 OF THE TENNESSEE RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, TENNESSEE CODE ANNOTATED § 29-21-101, AND TENNESSEE LAW ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL WHEREIN THE SAME DO NOT PERMIT A CHALLENGE TO A MATERIALLY IMPOSSIBLE ILLEGAL AND VOID SENTENCE OF WHICH A DEFENDANT ENTERED INTO WITHOUT ANY KNOWLEDGE AS TO ITS ILLEGALITY OR NO POTENTIAL FOR ITS ENFORCEMENT-AND OF WHICH RESULTED IN A SIX YEAR SENTENCE INCREASE ABSENT NOTICE, COUNSEL OR A HEARING-CREATE SUFFICIENT MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST AND AN INJUSTICE AS TO WARRANT SUPREME COURT REVIEW?

Whether the provisions of Rule 36.1 of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure, Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-21-101, and Tennessee law are unconstitutional