No. 18-6436
Jorge Cintron v. Tammy Ferguson, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Phoenix, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-violation certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-misconduct newly-discovered-evidence standing trial-procedure
Latest Conference:
2018-11-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
ISSUE 1:
Did the Court of Appeals Erred in denying a Certificate of Appeahility and in evaluating the claims under Brady violation
ISSUE 2:
Should this Honorable Court Grand Certiorari on Appellant newly undisclosed discovered evidence, that trial judge had on her possession at the time of trial and before trial.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Court of Appeals Erred in denying a Certificate of Appeability and in evaluating the claims under Brady violation
Docket Entries
2018-11-19
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-29
Waiver of right of respondents Tammy Ferguson, et al. to respond filed.
2018-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2018)
2018-08-02
Application (18A120) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until November 17, 2018.
2018-07-17
Application (18A120) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 18, 2018 to November 17, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Jorge Cintron
Jorge Cintron — Petitioner
Tammy Ferguson, et al.
Nancy Winkelman — District Attorney's Office, Respondent