L. WHETHER REVIEW IS WARRANTED BECAUSE THE TRIAL COURT
ERRED IN REFUSING TO SUPPRESS THE EVIDENCE AND FRUITS OF
THE ILLEGAL SEARCHES OF RESIDENCES AT CANDLEWYCK, EDWIN,
AND DRAGONFLY WHERE THE AFFIDAVITS IN SUPPORT OF THESE
SEARCH WARRANTS LACKED PROBABLE CAUSE AND THE GOOD
FAITH EXCEPTION COULD NOT OPERATE TO SAVE THESE
OBVIOUSLY DEFICIENT AFFIDAVITS?

II. WHETHER REVIEW IS WARRANTED BECAUSE THE TRIAL COURT
ERRED IN FINDING THAT MR. JENKINS LACKED STANDING TO
CHALLENGE THE SEARCH OF THE SUITCASE AND REFUSING TO
SUPPRESS THE EVIDENCE FOUND IN THE SUITCASE?

III. WHETHER REVIEW IS WARRANTED BECAUSE THE TRIAL COURT
ERRED IN REFUSING TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE DISCOVERED DURING
THE ILLEGAL SEIZURE AND SUBSEQUENT SEARCH OF THE FORD
FUSION?

Whether the trial court erred in refusing to suppress evidence from illegal searches