Michael Louis Beattie v. L. Romero, et al.
When, during Summary Judgment proceedings, a non-moving party asserts a fact - or set of facts - and the moving party doesn't dispute the fact, is the fact asserted considered admitted? Put another way, is an uncontroverted fact deemed admitted?
Is a prison grievance "properly submitted" when, per the prison's own regulations, the prison official on duty at the time takes possession of the grievance for the purpose of mailing it to the final level of review?
When prison officials lose a properly submitted grievance, and, as a direct of that loss, the time for submitting the grievance expires, is the prisoner deemed to have exhausted all "available" remedies?
When, during Summary Judgment proceedings, a non-moving party asserts a fact - or set of facts - and the moving party doesn't dispute the fact, is the fact asserted considered admitted? Put another way, is an uncontroverted fact deemed admitted?