Whether the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that Petitioner Vue "failed to state a claim" is in contrary to the holding of Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74 (2005), where Petitioner Vue, under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, challenges the constitutionality of the Oklahoma state parole procedures on constitutional and statutory grounds.

Whether Petitioner Vue's 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 claim on the crucial distinction between judicial review of substantive agency decisions and judicial review of the agency's compliance with the substantive requirements of Oklahoma Statutes title 57, § 332.7 (Supp. 2017) is cognizable to the Fourteenth Amendment of the United State's Constitution's "due process of law clause" and "equal protection of law clause."

Whether the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that Petitioner Vue failed to state a claim' is in contrary to the holding of Wilkinson v. Dotson