(1) WHEN A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER DELIBERATELY DELAYS AN ARREST IN ORDER TO BRING A SPOUSE BRING A PERSON OF INTEREST IN TO FOR QUESTIONING AND IN COMPLIANCE THAT PERSON OF INTEREST EXPERIENCES DURESS AND INDUCEMENT; CAN THE RESULT OF THOSE TWO ORDER

(2) WHEN A UNIFORM SERVICE MEMBER IS GIVEN AN ORBER STH COMMANDER, BY WIHETHER DIRECT OR INDIRECT TO TURN HIMSELF IN TO LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND GNVE A- SELF-INCRIMINATING STATEMENT AND THAT ORDER 1S REINFORED THRDUGH THEUE OFA ECRT AND SUPERVISION B-A SUERI OFFICER TO ACCOMPLISH IT;. CAN IT THEN BE SAID THAT THE ACTTONS OF THE SERVICE

(3) WITH REGARDS TO QUESTIONS 1&2, IF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFILERS ARE PROVEN To HAVE ADMISSIBLE AS FREE AND VOLUNTARY?

(5) WHEN COUNSEL GIES HIS CLIENT ERRONEOCIS ADVICE TO TAKE A DEAL WITH THE PROMISE TO ASSIST IN THE PREPARATION AND PRESENTATION OF DEFENSE; DOES NOT HIS ACTIONIS CONSTITUTE TO IN EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL?

(5) WHEN COUNSEL GIES HIS CLIENT ERRONEOCIS ADVICE TO TAKE A DEAL WITH THE PROMISE TO ASSIST IN THE His CLIENT; DOES NOT HIs ACTIONS CONSTITUTE TO INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL?

Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims alleging violations of his civil rights and due process rights