WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION
IN OVERLOOKING THE RELEVANT STATE LAW PROCEDURAL PRINCIPLES
UNDERLYING PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIM OF INEFFECTIVE
ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHEN DENYING A CERTIFICATE TO APPEAL
THE DENIAL OF 60(b) RELIEF

WHETHER A FEDERAL HABEAS COURT OWES DEFERENTIAL
REVIEW TO THE ORIGINAL STATE TRIAL COURT'S ORDER THAT
UNDERLIES THE SUBSEQUENT STATE HABEAS COURT'S ORDER

WHETHER REASONABLE JURISTS WOULD DEBATE THAT
EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES DOES NOT APPLY TO SUBDIVISIONS
(1) AND (4) OF RULE 60(b)

Whether the Eleventh Circuit abused its discretion in overlooking the relevant state law procedural principles underlying petitioner's constitutional claim of ineffective assistance of counsel when denying a certificate to appeal the denial of 60(b) relief