Omar Qazi v. Janice Killian, Warden, et al.
(1) Does 28 U.S.C. § 2243, authorize the District Court to dismiss a 2241 Petition for "failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted."?; (2) Does the 2241 Petition state a claim for which relief may be granted?; (3) Was the District Court required to address the arguments raised in the 2241 Petition?; (4) Did the District Court improperly order the certificate of appealability to be denied?; (5) Were the filings in the Ninth Circuit by Appellant (Notice of Appeal and Response to the Ninth Circuit's Order to Show Cause) equivalent to the filing of an Opening Brief on Appeal?; (6) Are the questions raised in the "Appeal" insubstantial?; and (7) Did the Ninth Circuit erroneously order a Summary Affirmance without Respondents filing a Motion for Summary Affirmance?
Does 28 U.S.C. § 2243 authorize dismissal of a 2241 petition for failure to state a claim?