Why the CA State Bar denied an investigation against Steven Rein, Esq. for his blackmail against me, & :-;why attorneys allowed to be relieved as an attorney of record on their word alone without evidence in support of their relief? And, why are those clients of an attorney forced against their will into a Pro Per status, & why are those in Pro Per status exected to know the law(s) like an attorney? which is unfair, unequal & by common sense preposterous requirement by the court. And, why the CA State Bar further denied an investigation against Steven Rein for his malpractice against me too? Please note: I'm a permanently, physically disabled person under ADA & suffer the side-effects from medications for my physical medical conditions& also suffer from Dyslexia which make my reading & writing most difficult, especially in legal matters, & the specifics of all the above circumstances which I've experienced first hand. Therefore, my understanding in these legal matters are greatly impaired which bear considerable discretion, flexibility & exceptions by this court or any court in the determinations rendered, assuming the merits are taken into these courts in the foregoing determinations where merit is actually redressed, especially in Pro Per status a constitutional issue as to whether that status is truly constitutional in any aspect? Why, since I'm under ADA, does the court expect me to function when I'm in severe & chronic conditions of lack of energy & fatigue,which Exhibit B, attests to my medical conditions that especially makes doing anything or going anywhere a medical &finàncial hardship. Why Attorney/Client written agreement(s) bias in favor of attorney as well as arbitraryiin their favor too? Why- are only an attorney's judgement in handling a litigation which denys a client of -.any--rights-in that process, & if I.e

Why are the methods used by State Bars highly bias in favor of attorneys over the rights of clients, especially the burden of proof that automatically in bias for the attorneys? Surely these "methods!' need judiciafairness by not allowing clients, their constitional rights as these Bars are a quasi-government arm of their State's Supreme Court for this investigation to protect clients from dishonest attorneys without obstacles to prevent an investigation to determine whether the allegations are true or not.

Why the CA State Bar denied an investigation against Steven Rein, Esq. for his blackmail against me, & why attorneys allowed to be relieved as an attorney of record on their word alone without evidence in support of their relief? And, why are those clients of an attorney forced against their will into a Pro Per status, & why are those in Pro Per status expected to know the law(s) like an attorney? which is unfair, unequal & by common sense preposterous requirement by the court. And, why the CA State Bar further denied an investigation against Steven Rein for his malpractice against me too?