No. 18-6379
Ramess Nakhleh v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law constitutional-challenge criminal-law due-process first-amendment free-speech postal-regulations public-forum vagueness vagueness-doctrine
Latest Conference:
2018-11-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is a regulation criminalizing the creation of a "loud and unusual noise" unconstitutionally vague?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a regulation criminalizing the creation of a 'loud and unusual noise' unconstitutionally vague?
Docket Entries
2018-11-19
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 19, 2018)
Attorneys
Ramess Nakhleh
Colleen P Fitzharris — Federal Defender Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent