I. Did the lower court err in granting summary judgment in favor of Respondents on Petitioner's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim, by issuing a decision that conflict with this Court's precedent regarding the denial of medical treatment?

II. Did the lower court err in granting summary judgment in favor of Respondents on Petitioner's claim under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, by entering a decision that conflict with this Court's precedent regarding the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment?

III. Did the lower court err in granting summary judgment in favor of Respondents, by entering a decision that conflict with this Court's precedent regarding how only a trier of fact can resolve genuine disputes of material facts?

IV. Did the lower court violate the law-of-the-case doctrine when it denied Davis' summary judgment motion on the merits, then granted Davis' summary judgment motion, on the second round without additional evidence?

Did the lower court err in granting summary judgment in favor of Respondents on Petitioner's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim, by issuing a decision that conflicts with this Court's precedent regarding the denial of medical treatment?