No. 18-6359

Uriel Gomez-Saavedra v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-10-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3661-3553 5th-amendment 5th-circuit-law constitutional-challenge criminal-sentencing due-process judicial-discretion mandatory-minimum sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2018-11-16
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. The mandatory five year minimum under which Mr. Gomez-Saavedra was sentenced is unconstitutional and contravenes 18 U. S.C. 3661 and 3553(a) because, as applied, it limits the discretion of the trial court to consider other factors in giving a lower sentence. We urge that under Rule 10, of the Rules of the United States Supreme Court, a compelling reason exists for granting this writ because 5th Circuit law on judicial discretion if sentencing does not comply with United States Supreme Court precedent.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the mandatory five-year minimum sentence under which Mr. Gomez-Saavedra was sentenced is unconstitutional and contravenes 18 U.S.C. 3661 and 3553(a) because it limits the discretion of the trial court to consider other factors in giving a lower sentence

Docket Entries

2018-11-19
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 19, 2018)

Attorneys

United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Uriel Gomez-Saavedra
Edward A. Stapleton III — Petitioner