No. 18-6353
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process legal-precedent prosecutor-misconduct prosecutorial-misconduct supreme-court supreme-court-jurisprudence supreme-court-precedent texas-court-of-criminal-appeals
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment
FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2018-12-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a prosecutor who violates the Double Jeopardy Clause should have exclusive power to determine which of his unconstitutionally obtained convictions should be vacated by the courts.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a prosecutor who violates the Double Jeopardy Clause should have exclusive power to determine which of his unconstitutionally obtained convictions should be vacated by the courts
Docket Entries
2018-12-10
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-11-14
Waiver of right of respondent Texas to respond filed.
2018-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 16, 2018)
Attorneys
Michael Joseph Bien
Keith S. Hampton — Petitioner
Texas
Elisha Naomi Bird — 35th Judicial District Attorney's Office, Respondent