Whether Section 1326(b), which does not define "misdemeanors involving drugs or violence against the person," "felony," or "aggravated felony," is unconstitutionally vague in light of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015).

Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in concluding that petitioner's prior Washington State conviction qualifies as a generic federal felony, given that Washington's definition of accomplice liability requires only a mens rea of "knowledge," whereas federal law requires a mens rea of "specific intent," making the Washington conviction overbroad under Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez, 549 U.S. 183 (2007).

Whether Section 1326(b) is unconstitutionally vague