did the 1st Diothict Count of appeal departiment from the essentinl reluinement of law ts Mandate By the uvited States Supreme the count muotmake A expre Findig ht petitine would No ogr Berefit thom the purpose of the eouithful offewder Act phion To iposing An Adult Sanction, When the recond is wholly void of Such,that Would Be of greate publicimportnce fer eoutu offender To be dewied Dueprocess, and Sestenced to b 6oyear Sentence Bepond the Sttitony maximum, Absence eaual Theatment woder the u.5 14th Amend Const.and Due process THerlin.

Whether the District Court of Appeals erred in dismissing petitioner's claim