No. 18-6309

Warren Justin Hardy v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2018-10-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: comparative-analysis equal-protection fair-trial fourteenth-amendment jury-selection peremptory-challenges peremptory-strike peremptory-strikes racial-discrimination racial-overtones sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2019-01-11
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether, in a case with racial overtones, the California Supreme Court's refusal to conduct a meaningful comparative analysis, or infer a likelihood of discriminatory purpose from the prosecutor's removal of the only African-American prospective juror, violates this Court's jurisprudence, the Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection, and the Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial by an impartial jury.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the California Supreme Court's refusal to conduct a meaningful comparative analysis or infer a likelihood of discriminatory purpose violates the Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection and the Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial

Docket Entries

2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-12-13
Brief of respondent People of the State of California in opposition filed.
2018-11-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 13, 2018.
2018-11-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 13, 2018 to December 13, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2018)

Attorneys

People of the State of California
Jonathan ames KlineOffice of the California Attorney General, Respondent
Warren Hardy
Susan Kathryn ShalerSusan K. Shaler Professional Law Corporation, Petitioner