QUESTION 1: .When UNACCEPTABLE INCUFFICIENT evidence is portrayed upon the Defendant within a criminal case, by way of prior criminal record; does "harmless error" CONSTITUTE the Due Process of Law found within the united States and State Law(sll to be moved from insitu towards "plain error" review of FACT?...

QUESTION 32: . . .When government attorney for defense/public defender DOES N07 17 make ANY verbal argument in effort or CARE to The Court to REMO( such FALSE evidence KNOWN to them through client and FACT of triers; DOES THAT or DOES NOT THAT omissive proffer ineffective assistance of counsel and incompetence to and of a "layman" in defense?...

Question 3: .. Is it in any way Constitutional if a Criminal Conviction is pheld and published for public record when the facts of previous conviction record and trial procedings transcript CLEARLY show purjured testimony before the Cross-Exam of D.A., and False account of criminal record for REVIEW for Justice fact finders?...

Question 4: . Can "harmless error" review be considered into the account of a Petitioner's error in application of need for redress/relief?...

Question 5: . When DUE diligence is shown by transcript record; as well as the FACTUAL case record of a CLEAR violation of the EVIDENCE CODE; that was found and obtained through TRANSCRIPT record ORDERED to be produced by the Honorable Magistrate Judge for proven FACT; is'nt that a CONSTITUTIONAL calling for an Evidentiary Hearing?...

When unacceptable insufficient evidence is portrayed upon the Defendant within a criminal case, by way of prior criminal record; does 'harmless error' constitute the Due Process of Law found within the United States and State Law(s) to be moved from insitu towards 'plain error' review of fact?