No. 18-6296
Alexander Robert Jacome v. California
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 9th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-law Constitutional-Rights due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment Fourth-Amendment free-speech ninth-amendment Parole-Conditions
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
Will this Court reverse the lower Courts substantial violations of the Fourth Amendment's substantive due process clause, or allow the respondent's continuing violations of the First, Ninth and Fourth Amendments of the United States Constitution to continue?
Are these conditions of parole invalid?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Will this Court reverse the lower Courts substantial violations of the Fourteenth Amendment's substantive Due Process clause, or allow the unprecedented continuing violations of the First, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution to continue?
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-10-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2018)
Attorneys
Alexander Jacome
Alexander Robert Jacome — Petitioner