Whether a_violation of-Petitioner's 4th_Amendment Constituti=
onal Right to Prvacy occorred when Police illegally Searched
bonk records, in the absence of
and -Seized Petitioner's
a. Search. Warruht?

Whether Petitioher. Suffered total deprivation of his bth Amendment. Constitutional Righs to effective assistance of trfcl consel, whch. trial counsel huds't brought any issueson.
or didn't bring any motions when he was cowhsel?.

whether trial coort deprived petitioner of his bth Amendment. Constitotional Risht-to tral-counsel, when tncl. cour+ refosed.to asrsint new counsel for petitioner and forced
Petitioher to choose either (1) Self-vepresentatidhn,. or (2)
accest deficient-Performing tricl consel as representatioh, beF
fore _Proceeding.to_Jury trial?.

whether trial court deprived. Petitioner of his btth Amendment
Konstitotiohal. Right. to Comtulsory Process, when trial coort..
denied Petitioher alless to a Subpoenaed detense withess
whose testimiry woud have been favorable to the defense
had she bxen-allowed to testifylat trial?

whether_insufficientevidence to_Sustain.Petitioner's convictixhs...
has_been _Proveh. but. ighored in the lower courts, entitling Pet :
itioher_to_a. foll _Jodgmerst Of.acquittal Lon all counts_fr=
omthis _coor?

whether a violation.of Petitioher's bth Amendment Constit-.
utional Risht to effectie assistance of appellate counsel occu-.
cred, lohen appellate coonsel fired a meritless direct appeal?

Whether violation of Petitioner's 4th Amendment Constitutional rights occurred when Police illegally searched and seized Petitioner's files and records, in the absence of a search warrant?