Did the Fifth Circuit err in affirming a district court's conclusion that service of process by Certified Mail - a summons with a copy of the complaint as delivered by an employee or agent of the United States Postal Service - is insufficient under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure?

2. Did the Fifth Circuit err in affirming a district court's conclusion that claims arising out of intentional inflictions of emotional distress, invasions of privacy, forced involvement, thefts, appropriations, and conversions comprising civil statutory causes of action, civil tort causes of action, civil liability and negligence causes of action, and deprivations of rights as guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the United States and the state of Texas were too "patently frivolous" for a federal court to assert subject matter jurisdiction?

Did the Fifth Circuit err in affirming a district court's conclusion that service of process by Certified Mail is insufficient under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure?