Dennis Martin v. Oklahoma, et al.
SERK HABKA
d0
whiN
A MrrtAly Ao Phy sictly
D5SABLK
SAtA PRISO NKA 1S hA IW PRTEON FOR
33 YARs -BEFoK- ha FiNOs oat thnt ho
tRiKD, CONUTCt DR
WAS NKUTR ARKSOD
Stota cout hs No
RECORD oF hFS EVUE
BEN ARRAND D SENSNC ANS PRRON
S StAM CAN pot PRO PueK
A JUOGMK
AMD SKNTENCOO%
ORD ER
3
2)-
IS H ABUSK O DISCRATFON tO
Diay
A
Withot
CRRHFICAS OF APPKALABICI
Ou PoC or A ha, ?
(3)-WhEN the stte
EAN NOT RODCL A
RECOND OF A PERONS AREST, BOND PROCAMOTN,
Of A JUOtLMKAt Ae SENtANCONt
OROXWhH
MaNAS 1s AVArLAlE tO hrM tO SAaK RELE
Whar State COURts SUS PEND HnBRAs, A FaKAL
CouT RKrUSK tO AULO A AI Df MOCESS
Whether the state court erred in dismissing the petitioner's habeas corpus petition as untimely under the state's statute of limitations