No. 18-6237

Jacob L. Smith v. United States

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-10-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 18-usc-3553 appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-appeal due-process gall-v-united-states plain-error plain-error-review preservation-of-error sentencing sentencing-variance
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-03-15 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

In order to preserve a § 3553(c) challenge to the adequacy of the district court's sentencing explanation, must a party, who is given no opportunity to object to the imposed sentence, take exception or object to that explanation in the district court.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

In order to preserve a § 3553(c) challenge to the adequacy of the district court's sentencing explanation, must a party, who is given no opportunity to object to the imposed sentence, take exception or object to that explanation in the district court

Docket Entries

2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-20
Reply of petitioner Jacob Smith filed. (Distributed)
Main DocumentProof of Service
2019-02-01
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
Certificate of Word CountMain Document
2018-12-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 1, 2019.
2018-12-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 2, 2019 to February 1, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
Main Document
2018-11-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 2, 2019.
2018-11-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 30, 2018 to December 31, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
Main Document
2018-10-31
Response Requested. (Due November 30, 2018)
2018-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2018-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 8, 2018)
PetitionMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisProof of Service

Attorneys

Jacob Smith
Daniel Tyler Hansmeier — Federal Public Defender's Office for the District of Kansas, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent