Whether the district court erred in failing to consider Petitioners claim under the Abstention Doctrine, YOUNGER V HARRIS 401 US 37 (1971), Prosecution was taken in bad faith without hope of obtaining a valid conviction, PEREZ V LEDESMA 401 US 82(1971); Explained in PAREDES V ATHERTON (2000 CA10 COLO) 224 F3rd 1160.

Whether the district court erred that petitioner has not exhausted remedy per Title 20USC §2254(b)(1),(ii) and whether extraordinary circumstances exist which would require interference per PHILLIPS V WOODFORD (2001) 267 F3rd 956.

Whether the district court erred in failing to consider Petitioner's claim under the Abstention Doctrine, YOUNGER-V-HARRIS