No. 18-6134
Scott Peters v. John Baldwin, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights court-discretion dismissal due-process federal-claim legal-action procedural-issue standing summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Thogh th ort Fo FAic to Peosece Becous Pettonkn CoulD Not
COME op with thet5ooe, whew oft prisoNERs whe May Havk
5O0 COULD PUL FORWAA HSOO.D ANd AAUE MENE CASE
ADjudte, Is THis Diseintion Fon SAke af the 14th Amnet
MOREOVER SINCE THE CASE WAS ONy DOUMENTE WiH He Jt
Cincit o t Petto y BeCgd 5.o D
THE ISSVE Ad He FSSUk wouD nat Hae Been Shanigkd out
witout Forcing coretion By te nchtetiow ce te courps without
THk Filing of He soit. Petitowl DiD not firepasely oR maliciousiy
No falt of His own,
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims due to lack of standing and failure to prosecute
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-12-12
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 29, 2018)
Attorneys
Scott Peters
Scott Peters Jr. — Petitioner