1. Did thE distriet cout Enr in Not granting thE AcauksEd
A probAble cAUsE to hotd hEAriNg
AF ATAIMEN?

WithDIT (DURKE/?

3. MAy thE SHAtE FMEE I LAWyEr LIPON tHE MEAUSEd WhEN
hE iNSISS tht hE ANES CONCt Ais AH EFENSE?

5). WHIB thE inANTTY
illegsl
2
2
thE AnISEd
alotiCE DF AppEAL?

A Did the IAt oirenit cinrt oF Appeals Er in desying
the ANSEd AppEAL?

R). I.S THE ACANSEd iMlEGAlly SEAENCEd D E ESErNL
LDUiSAAA METH HEhh SUSTEML FOrEUSC UUit?

10). Did thE LDILISIANA SUPrEME
Court Err in denying
OF tHE AeasEd Apped Aaet NloticE DF Appert.

B.A A PRETSiAL dEbAiNEE dOES thE StATE
PAVE TO PIDVidE
All MEANS FOr AEGUAtE pIEpESATION?

15). Is ADEl HUly dAL ASSiSA to HHE dEFENdNT iN
SEF-TEPIESENTAHION?

1d. Whts the ALLaIsEd ilegAly MESted?

1 IS tHE dAsed illegily
detrined?

18. HAS tHE HiME LiMitHiOnl pASt AUd ExpIrEd For PIDSEdAring
thE AeasEd ON tHE ChArgEd AATiONS?

19. MAs HhE Boil EXCESSIive in AMDUNt?

21.Shonild the
De immediately rEleased?
AcenKEd

22 Shoeld HE Acaised he rEintnsed ,0

Whether the State of Louisiana violated the petitioner's constitutional rights