Qustionis, as a staterprisoner does Afiant Spottuillehane vested, tinding Constitutionep sight to file a 28 uscs 5 224 petition in the dostrict court tochallenge the epecution of state sentence od did homot file a &224

2) Qustions i ifAlliant's isues ae Conodilutiona ad would of entifle to selif Aater ad federal counts, him M where "Exceptional Crcunstances"9 and a vital flaws" exist in state fat finding procedures, sondencing d appellate Phases of thi's crininal caser puenent. oof 2241

3 Quio, ds At m . Secvice member posss vested, tinding rights purquentto 5/814 Amendments fhll would ent correct his sevtence, tho dwation of ol to inodify state custdy

4. Qustion is, do th ledenal couds hane duty to hold its heaving. whow the State Court did not decide onthe presended in this casyad's issues

5.) Question is, were the lover couts decisions (state determination federal) are tased on aw unreasonable presented, such as, Affiants of the facts S2241 filed habeas petition in the dituct cout; tha was should anot the Count emodify sentence?

Qustion is, when ffint preent to satad 6 Rederal towts: U. Sepreme Cout's "STARS DECISIS" and cites Constitutional wolationsthatdowt, shouldanot the lowercouts' decisions muror those of tho Supreme lout o Law ofthe as tand o?

is, as a former U5. Amyfervicementer 7.) Quastion actine diy at fine of ares thnough on Sentencing : Affiant hamo vested, tinder Constotul fiondl ad fedual sifts to to fried and sentenced na of Military fustice Unitorn Code (UCms) jurisdiction a juy of his militarypers no Cinilian state

8.) Question ig, as a Soldior at tine of anest dees ad deputy hame anthority to use dedly state sheriff force to arrest unarined dy shroating the suspect Afliant in the bowertacod leg as he fled into nght aw open füild away from 0 officers Possing no immedharm oo threat to anyone iate 2

9.) Qustion is, as a Sodien onactinediaty did ste extablished fh court hames dhu anthority to wiolate sights resulting us enal " juisdiction upoteng 080 $\qr}$ custody where jurstiction ad pureuent to 2241 do clearly cause leading molations, was original delectine con manmery and location(Venue) of the sondencing 2 Decause of "Sundamental miscarriage Question is, u.) Gd oow efablils naw precedent Q juatice", will d all activedidy seniceneAftfeaint t Succer protection to u jidction bers' Constifutional d custody (Veme) a 12.Qustion in dects. Cont finds Shauld the Court mow predisposed fundamental sendence on place

Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to review the lower courts' decisions regarding the application of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) to habeas corpus petitions