No. 18-6008
Anibal Pagan-Romero v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-trial dictionary dictionary-use due-process fifth-amendment first-circuit jury jury-instructions presumption-of-prejudice remmer-presumption remmer-v-united-states
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2018-10-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
A. Whether the Petitioner was denied due process of law where the District Court, over the objection of Defendant provided the jury with a dictionary which the jury used to look up the word "knowingly" and whether the First Circuit erred in not applying the presumption of prejudice set forth in Remmer v. United States, 347 US 227, 229 (1954).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Petitioner was denied due process of law where the District Court, over the objection of Defendant provided the jury with a dictionary which the jury used to look up the word 'knowingly' and whether the First Circuit erred in not applying the presumption of prejudice set forth in Remmer v. United States, 347 US 227, 229 (1954)
Docket Entries
2018-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
2018-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 17, 2018)
Attorneys
Anibal Pagan-Romero
Paul M. Glickman — Glickman LLC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent