No. 18-60
Amira Olivia Gunn v. North Dakota
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech speech-protection
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment DueProcess
FirstAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Gunn was convicted of speech protected
by the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment,
applicable to the States under the Due Process Clause
of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Gunn was convicted of speech protected by the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, applicable to the States under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-18
Waiver of right of respondent North Dakota to respond filed.
2018-07-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 10, 2018)
Attorneys
Amira Gunn
Michael Ray Hoffman — Law Office of Michael R. Hoffman, Petitioner
North Dakota
Marina Spahr — Burleigh County State's Attorney Office, Respondent