No. 18-5998
Keith Lapell Biggins v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 11th-circuit 28-usc-2253 appellate-procedure appellate-review buck-v-davis case-law certificate-of-appealability civil-rights due-process eleventh-circuit federal-procedure habeas-corpus statutory-interpretation statutory-operation
Latest Conference:
2018-10-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the United Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Contrary to Buck v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759 Inverted the Mode of Statutory Operation 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)?
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Improperly Applied McQuiggins v. Perkins, 133 S. Ct. 1924?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Contrary to Buck v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759 Inverted the Mode of Statutory Operation 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)?
Docket Entries
2018-10-15
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2018-09-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
2018-09-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-05-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2018)
Attorneys
Keith L. Biggins
Keith L. Biggins — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent