Gene Lemay Barris v. United States
1.How ion a sentencing Coust sentenct a defeadent cutside of the
Gui delines orainally out lindd in Tue defendents pka @gret moat. Dots
2. Hou Or can aisentencing Jodge Sentence a defendent witna 3ss3
shid detendent without frct downd wend defatore
6sentences
beinn cpplied to detndeits aow (ouer buide line farge. anle
those sentecing fuctors Mave not chanaed or beer chellanged
By tne boween ment.
abnstitute a Violation of dre Process. Also
Light of Jolnson
defendent hed to point out confiict of
Intrest between
defendent and Public Deferders of fice a
vionlaton of Deferdents R.gnts.
count as a defendents asss
tovacabe Set aside ar correct
motiDn
not Qualify for.
ho upsclibk issues rot frae tt he wes ineffectice Sihce
I heve been granted relief.
have a supression hearig bustd on a litter from Us. Attorny Tin will
at thet time dots thet nut Bria into
Gvistionne
validty ot tre ielatire condeet
p{ti on
ofm4PSI
Whether the sentencing court erred in imposing an unreasonable sentence on the defendant in violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment