1. Whether where PoSe (Self-Representation Defendant, HASAe MURAD oSIRIS
A BEYAH ChETME, "HASAN MURAD" COMPLnd he had a PRETRIAC
DETENTIal lawsuit ot was impossible Cas long os he made It froun
in custady"to the courthase to lose (andthat he was thereafter
deprired oI hes ntrip to the corthause") i that,he had seen, used,
and in Application fr Reheating Wath Seggestian for Rehearing. En Banc
specitially said the same reasoning in a subseguently
handed
down Ciroit coutof a ppeals case Crelerant and applicable to his
own), that, in antiapation of later arguments by this Court
served and ed a "SUPPLEMENTAl CoMPLAINT"
against "TRIA
u
AND-APPELATE KUKSELS)"; and, PeFTiOnEd for CERTIORARI.
"SELF-REPRESENTATIAN ON APEA" - thIs CUt ward reach the
conclusiar "H Nu" war not unnally deped of the
right of "self-representatio" in this
single"case?
2.Whather Yangerrbrs applies whee not poying damages
wed in conterminous, preceding claimes) is alleged to be the
governmental motive and reoson for
ese resral, ang o esal
RECORD?
3. Whether where tA MURAD is and thoughat has been
a HeARonco to prevent relitigatian is preferable?
4. Whother where HsA MoRD pettoned por conviction
relies upon
physically impossble" CI and THRY o ENTR findings of Pct the
A
govetnment has ony
interest against a Herone being
paunba
P
ofthe
factul findings o
of the timely challenged (fam evey exhaustion
required directian) prior convictioncs)?
5. WhEther Whece HASAN MURAD has never been given a HEARaNG
CRouD Two othe presenty pending and relatedhabeas corpur
"AppeA"ond rised hs hysic ipaside"cisthraugh
Pretrial Motion To DomEs
Cew4ok and NearJesey) Post Tal Motiancs)
Nowtork and New Jessey Motion for Judgment of Acqittal CNew
Jecsey) and ProSe
SUPPLEMAUTAL APOUCATE BRIEF(S)
issuecs of
FACT remain
6. WhEter SUSEUeNt RECORD OF CANICTIN BgAnSt HAA MURAD
Incoporati a preceding. timly challenged, RECoRD CovicTN agt
rItEGHES tHE FACT RECORD of the -UNT CERTIORARI,
HASIAN MURAD
precedin. COnstAAtional, PRO COnViotOncs), FOUD TO BE INcREDEBLE
AS A MAFTER OF LAN OND INCORPORATED-BY-REFERENCE
7. WHAHE, as HAAN
Whether HASAN MURAD OSTRES AND BRYAN was unconstitutionally deprived of the right to self-representation