No. 18-5976

In Re Jaame Amun Re El

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2018-09-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law banking-statutes civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-violations criminal-statutes due-process federal-habeas-corpus judicial-review judicial-role legal-hermeneutics separation-of-powers statutory-construction statutory-drafting statutory-interpretation statutory-language statutory-meaning textual-analysis
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2018-10-05
Question Presented (from Petition)

Qustin.Is t ueditat's duty toterret a ta?

Question. Are Banking statutes appropriate for alleged banking violations?

Can a Federal prisoner seek relief and redress by direct appeal to the Supreme Court due to constitutional violations?

Question. Ifa statement within an Indictment conflicts with an associated Affidavit In Support of a Warrant To search, is that considered a "variance"by and or according.to the language of "variance" defined?

Question. Is a variance a reversible error?

Question. Is Title 28 Uscs $30oa active or repealed?

Question.1s Fed. Rul.Civ.Proc.Rule E(5)(a)e) repealed?

Question.1s Title 28Uscs$2464(a) repealed?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is it a judge's/administration's duty to interpret a statute?

Docket Entries

2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-07-13
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Jaame Amun Re El
Jaame Amun Re El — Petitioner