No. 18-5967
Matthew Wade Howard v. United States
Tags: circuit-split criminal-law due-process federal-courts federal-criminal-law federal-guideline guideline-application sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation tenth-circuit
Latest Conference:
2018-10-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Tenth Circuit and other circuits have broadened the application of
U.S.S.G. 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) beyond the plain language of the guideline's text and
commentary?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Tenth Circuit and other circuits have broadened the application of U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) beyond the plain language of the guideline's text and commentary?
Docket Entries
2018-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
2018-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2018)
Attorneys
Matthew Howard
John Carl Arceci — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent