When police know that a "confidential informant" being used to secure a search warrant is a suspect's spouse, is the failure to note the spousal relationship on the application for the search warrant a violation of a person's 4th Amendment right against unlawful search and seizures, their 5th Amendment right not to incriminate themselves under marital privilege protection and their 14th Amendment right to due process of law?

Can "exigent circumstances" resulting in a warrantless search ever exist when the item desiring to be searched is in the control of the U.S. Postal Service in violation of a person's 4th Amendment right against unlawful search and seizures, and their 14th Amendment right to due process of law?

Whether the Florida 4th District Court of Appeal erred in its decisions in this case, which conflict with relevant decisions of the Supreme Court