No. 18-595

James P. Tatten v. City and County of Denver, Colorado, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-06
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights debt-collection due-process fair-debt-collection fair-debt-collection-practices-act foreclosure fourteenth-amendment pro-se-litigation rooker-feldman-doctrine standing subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether this Court's decision in Haines v. Kerner permits a United States Court of Appeals to create a special and unique pro se pleading standard for cognitively-disabled litigants.

Whether the court erred in barring 42 U.S.C. §1983 claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.

Whether the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act applies to non-judicial foreclosure proceedings.

Whether the Fourteenth Amendment permits non-judicial foreclosure to authorize a state actor to sell and vest title in real property secured by a deed of trust extinguished by operation of state law.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Tenth Circuit erred in creating a special pro se pleading standard for cognitively-disabled litigants

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 6, 2018)
2018-08-02
Application (18A125) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until November 2, 2018.
2018-07-25
Application (18A125) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 3, 2018 to November 2, 2018, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.

Attorneys

James P. Tatten
James Patrick Tatten — Petitioner