Judicial 15-16
District Court failure to comply with 28 U.S.C.636 16-17
claims ignored by the District Court.17-18
State Probationary Split Sentence Violates the Supremacy Clause/Conflict
Pre-emption Doctrine of Article 6; Clause 2, of the United States

Original State Court divested itself of subject matter and personal
jurisdiction, and intentionally withheld "real notice of the true nature
of the offense charged upon defendants request . 19-20
Original State Court participation in withholding

Insufficient evidence to support the
Denied requests for evidentiary 24-25
§2254(d)(1) and/or (2) never properly applied in review of petitioners
cited Supreme Court precedent as mandated by those

Petitioner was prejudiced by denied requests for appointment of
counsel where "Constitutional violations and actual innocence" are
obvious upon the face of the record, meaning all of the foregoing only
served to exacerbate the already existing fundamental miscarriage of
justice that could have been more appropriately and effectively
addressed by experienced counsel actually working in petitioners best

issues being raised