No. 18-5938
Mark David Bailey v. Noah Nagy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-violation constitutional-error criminal-procedure due-process evidence expert-evidence habeas-corpus sixth-amendment sixth-circuit-review suppression-of-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-11-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
1.) Can a fairminded jurist exclude expert evidence indicating that someone else committed a murder based solely on the jurist's lay disagreement with the expert's conclusions?
2.) Can a fairminded jurist conclude that the State's suppression of the exonerating fingerprint analysis failed to violate Brady?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a fairminded jurist exclude expert evidence indicating that someone else committed a murder based solely on the jurist's lay disagreement with the expert's conclusions?
Docket Entries
2018-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.
2018-10-18
Waiver of right of respondent Noah Nagy, Warden to respond filed.
2018-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 11, 2018)
2018-06-29
Application (18A3) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 23, 2018.
2018-06-21
Application (18A3) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 24, 2018 to August 23, 2018, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Mark David Bailey
Noah Nagy, Warden
Aaron David Lindstrom — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent