Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, and other Courts involved acted in a manner inconsistent with due process and violated the U.S. Supreme Court Law and precedent governing review of fraud on the court actions by summarily affirming the Petitioner's Federal District Court actions for relief from judgment procured by fraud on the court - all without ever reviewing Petitioner's fraud on the court allegations, the very subject matter of his action, and the very allegations, proven with prima facie evidence, that entitle him to relief?

Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals decision is contrary to their own opinion and the United States Supreme Court Precedents and states: a judgment is a "void judgment" if the court that rendered judgment... acted in a manner inconsistent with due process?"

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in there ruling of res judicata, differs from the Six Circuit, where collateral estoppel nor res judicata is not rigidly applied in administrative actions; both rules are qualified or rejected when their application would contravene overriding public policy or result in Manifest Injustice.. Whether res judicata is blocking the truth" and is shielding the fraud and the cheat as well as the honest person?

Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals and other courts acted inconsistently with due process and Supreme Court precedent in affirming the petitioner's fraud on the court claims without review