1. Should BAS cov exercise YS Super visecy authority to reverse Nig Bakers cangpiracy comvichon ®

By the end th trial, the government concluded that "Ave" agreeMents exsted, rather than the Single Agreement chatged in the Indic Ment, Constructyely amending Are Wdictrrent.

a) Did the goverament™ commit & KolteakoS exrac la USiNg evidence "oF mauttple censpiracies 4a Support an wndickment, for a Single Canspacy P Korreakos vilnited Slates 338 U-S. ce TSO, WT IT, Le S.G.1a3y C1) + Urored States v. Lager T4e F.3d O90 LAAN Ge, aO19).

DY Did the Riading ot "Swe" agceements Warrant a seahe Unanimcty Lasiuchon | if Se did the courts Sarture to sua Spuve give Such Ustruchen Create the SK of a nonunani, mous Verdict aS granted by Arncle Than2d , and the Sith Amendment of Fre United? States Conshtuhon. United States VG Vey B34 Fad (Oe \Ala-\S (44h ae, \48%).

2. Under Roe v. Pores Ortega 588 U.SNT0, ATSB, (20 S. CA 1024 (2000) Appellate, Coungel WAS apt ak Woerty +t disregard the appellate wWithes of Nig baker | avd Nir Nitrano \islate her ahcth Amendment Fide +e eSeclive BoStance oF Counsel by abandoning her wishes on direct appeal'? er appeal would Key have | mexcke Redeiguer Vv. acted Stakes 3% U.S. 387, 330, 84.9.6. TIS Lida)

3. Putledge ve Werted Stakes 511 W-3.A9Q, tle SCH. AAV Ciaate) , holds Maat Cumulative punishment (Ss unauthorized by Congress , NS baker reCTT EL CIT BOF EGTA SAVENTR TCA AG SIO CAINS AIAG BET Such Sentence. Une Court algo senbeneed hee ko cancurrent berms © OF BHO manthS om the Same counts -twe- eleven vialakon of the double jenpary clause. Did The Fourth Gireuit commit a Rutledge esvror?

NWas Vee district Court sequiced +o hypothetical specify drug quartry , at Sentencing nearing © orkedd States \. Patterson QO" U.S, hoe LEXIS \BOW_ CH cir) :

TH 30 did Ws Sauce 40 Speaty Bllow ne Astrick courte be Consider On "the record the applicable guideline range, under V5.6. adil?

5 Dees vhe remedy ta Marta N- Ryan S&e &S.\ MENT, 12 S.Gn Se Wow') and Trevine Vv. ~ Thaler 153 S.

Whether the government committed a Kotteakos violation by using evidence of multiple conspiracies to support an indictment for a single conspiracy