No. 18-5881

Vamsidhar Vurimindi v. The Hoopskirt Lofts Condominium Association

Lower Court: Pennsylvania
Docketed: 2018-09-05
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights condominium-law constitutional-violations due-process fair-housing-act fifth-amendment first-amendment fourteenth-amendment property-rights racial-discrimination
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment FirstAmendment
Latest Conference: 2019-03-29 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the Pennsylvania Uniform Condominium Act enables racially motivated majority members of a condominium association to purge a minority member of the condominium in violation of the United States Constitution First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments and Article I § 10, and creates an obstacle to the accomplishment of the full purposes and objectives of the Fair Housing Act.

Whether fictitious service of a foreclosure complaint upon a prison guard not authorized to accept original service of a complaint on behalf of inmates, and the prison guard's failure to deliver the foreclosure complaint to an incompetent inmate whose property is subject to foreclosure and without a guardian, violates notice before deprivation of property under the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause.

Whether a sheriff sale of a debtor's property after 11 USCA § 362 issued an automatic stay creates an obstacle to the accomplishment of the full purposes and objectives of Congress in enacting 11 USCA § 362.

Whether a sheriff sale of property the day after the publicized date of sale without notice to an indispensable party, and the sheriff's sale of property for less than 5% of fair market value, violates a property owner's right to informing potential bidders to ensure that the sheriff sale garners the best possible price.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Pennsylvania Uniform Condominium Act violates the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments and the Fair Housing Act

Docket Entries

2019-04-01
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2019-03-13
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2019-02-28
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2018-11-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2018-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-08-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 5, 2018)

Attorneys

Vamsidhar Vurimindi
Vamsidhar Vurimindi — Petitioner